🔥 Prohibited Programs, Tools and Services

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🎰

Filter:
Sort:
A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Some of the latter set of tools, like bots, have been banned for as long or HUD), but make use of only information accumulated through your.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars, the biggest and most trusted name in online poker, has launched two room is moving towards banning all forms of tracking tools, including HUDs. A HUD or Heads-Up Display is a software program that displays.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

DriveHUD †, Flopzilla (version and newer) †, Gam Poker Analyzer PokerProLabs Super HUD, PokerProLabs Top Shark Pro, PokerProLabs Tournament.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars, the biggest and most trusted name in online poker, has launched two room is moving towards banning all forms of tracking tools, including HUDs. A HUD or Heads-Up Display is a software program that displays.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

DriveHUD †, Flopzilla (version and newer) †, Gam Poker Analyzer PokerProLabs Super HUD, PokerProLabs Top Shark Pro, PokerProLabs Tournament.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

🔥 An Overview

Software - MORE
A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

DriveHUD †, Flopzilla (version and newer) †, Gam Poker Analyzer PokerProLabs Super HUD, PokerProLabs Top Shark Pro, PokerProLabs Tournament.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars, the biggest and most trusted name in online poker, has launched two room is moving towards banning all forms of tracking tools, including HUDs. A HUD or Heads-Up Display is a software program that displays.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

God online players have such a massive edge vs any casual wanting to play that its legit ruining the online game. Good move from PokerStars to level the.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

🔥

Software - MORE
A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Yes. PokerStars has a complicated history with HUDs, as a large portion of their players are experienced online poker players who utilize tracking software to their.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

🔥

Software - MORE
A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

DriveHUD †, Flopzilla (version and newer) †, Gam Poker Analyzer PokerProLabs Super HUD, PokerProLabs Top Shark Pro, PokerProLabs Tournament.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars hud ban

Sure this might also "level the playing field", but I think, this is taking it to far. I also think, its pretty clear, that online poker has been in a slow decline for 10 years, and especially the traditional cash game tables are in danger of dyeing a slow shark filled death. Remember Me? I cannot see Pokerstars doing this. September 5th, , PM. This is, what PartyPoker has done not only by banning HUDs but also by killing the traditional poker lobby, so players can no longer chose, which table to enter, or which seat. Even if it's possible to cheat e. This makes "bum hunting" much more difficult and force sharks to spend more time playing against each other. They will probably keep it,in my opinion ,as most players are using a hud atm. I feel, this put the integrety of online poker in jeopardy, and it also take away the option of players to work on their game away from the tables. The way Party has gone about this was by removing hand histories rather than just banning them which makes them more susceptible to fraud and collusion. That's my main hope, because I love online poker, and it's never going to be live poker no matter what you try and do. For me personally I am not going to play poker, if its not allowed to be a long term winning player, or if games are made essentially unbeatable. It's just really bad reasoning. Yong didn't just ban Huds he banned tracking software like PT4 and all the others. Personal preferences surely play a role here. Join Date: May Join Date: Dec I don't think so, PS is much more bigger than party and if they'll ban hud many players will not like it i don't like hud because i haven't it, but in future i wanna buy it, very useful thing. Join Date: Jul PokerStars recently changed the max numbers of tables you can simultaneously play on cash games from 24 to 4 only , and the reason for that was to keep the game's ecosystem sustainable for all players, so players that play just for fun, can still find it enjoyable Party Poker for the very same reasons banned the use of HUDs, do you think PS will do that to? The main proponent of the changes on PartyPoker has been Rob Yong, who is a casino owner and also high stakes live poker player. I think, its fairly subjective, which solution is best. There are pros and cons. Forgot Password? HUDs are data, that's it. One possible answer is to try and change the "shark to fish" ratio, so that each table on average is containing more fish and less sharks. HUDs don't have one single thing at all to do with the poker ecosystem. The consensus seem to be, that if new players lose their money to fast, they are unlikely to continue playing, so the question should be, how can poker sites make new players lose their money more slowly? I'm sure that professional players would not be happy with such a decision but for new players and for the ecosystem I think it would be an inspired solution. September 3rd, , PM. John A. I am against the use of hud I think it should really be blocked. Where is the money in online poker? I hope they ban them. And Rob Yong is entering pots with hands like 73s and generally playing in a way, that online would earn him a "fish" mark from every single regular very quickly. September 3rd, , AM. Join Date: Apr The main issue is that the games are getting more difficult. I like to play with a HUD, and I rarely play much more than 4 tables, so for me the solution, PokerStars has chosen, is nearly ideal and might actually see me return to the site as my main place to play cash games. For now however the result does seem to be, that traffic at PokerStars is slightly down, but the cash games have become noteciably softer and looser, as was the intention. Banning poker HUDs is equivalent to saying we should ban data in all sports. August 29th, , AM. September 9th, , PM. The main thing is if enough sites ban HUDs, they are just going to go into black markets and be much less accessible and much more expensive, and provide even bigger edges that current sellers don't provide because it would be unfair to do so. Then he can promote "look no big winners, this is fair for everyone". Maybe Rob Yong feel, that poker should be all about gambling and having fun, and that it is wrong to even try to develop a long term winning strategy. If the ban of the HUD makes them earn more money, then they'll certainly will. Originally Posted by fundiver It had to be banned using hud!!!!! My 2 cents. Have never used a HUD myself. I like what HUDs do but it is not fair to play against a person using a HUD, they should have notes of there own on you, not let a machine tell you the exact statistics.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} How do you feel about not allowing players to use HUD? People playing more than 4 tables are generally winners, so when they are forced to play less, there will be less sharks at the table. September 4th, , PM. But as poker players we need to ask ourselfes, if this is also our ideal for the game? It's kind of a double edged sword removing huds, it also removes the amount of information you can play with and the level of analysis you want to give the game but they come most in to use for people playing lots of tables at once. The only part, I am highly critical about, is getting rid of hand histories. So it's a lot more profitable have a massive number of recreative players, even they play micro stakes, then some professionals playing all day with softwares. I dont think, PartyPokers solution is wrong though. From the perspective of a casino owner that sort of make sense, because if nobody is winning long term, then all the money end up as rake. In the number of hands and tournaments played. August 29th, , PM. Originally Posted by John A. Join Date: Sep If all the other rooms ban the huds, there is no way Pokerstars don't do it. It is very ugly!!! Join Date: Oct If they do I consider playing cash games there again. It's not an issue of getting and finding players that has poker sites scrambling to try and figure out the best scenario for players and their bottom line. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}Up your game with free cardschat membership. This is basically, what PokerStars is trying to do with the table cap. Join Date: Mar They will look at it see how it is going elsewhere and then make their decision. I just hope we don't try and turn online poker into live poker. Removing huds may mean people play less tables so the sites have less player volume and less bonuses and guarantee's. That program has helped my game a lot but I think Yong doesn't want players to improve just to shoot money back and forth across the table. Join Date: Jun This would level the playing field and give advantage to those that can best interpret the data. And I cant help thinking, that this also say a lot about the changes on PartyPoker. Eliminating the HUD would provide an additional chance for recreational players and could bring a fresh air to the poker pools where regs take a big advantage by using helpful tools to increase their winnings. Join Date: Jan I dont use hud. Ban HUDs, it is only fair that your do the research on a certain player and have notes taking down about how you feel they play, not having a machine or software program doing this is only fair. August 28th, , PM. In the last few years, poker has actually been back on an incline world wide though. No more stats in baseball! I loved HUDs well before I ever sold them because they are amazing tools to learn and get better at a game I assume we all love if we're playing it. Nikolay Nakhaev. As for what further steps poker sites might take, including PokerStars, I think, they are going to take some time to evaluate the effect of the table cap, because they look to implement further big changes. I mean, why should we allow people to collect all of this data, and shift their players, and pitch to the locations where the hitters have the least success? The other option is to try and take edges away from the sharks. My take on this issue is, that poker sites, professional, and semiprofessional players have a common interest in securing, that recreational players come into the game and then continue playing, because this is the only way, anyone can make a profit. If Pokerstars gets a sharks paradise image, the new players will choose another room. And therefore I am not really on board with the way, Rob Yong think about this. Maybe some will also react by moving up, which will further soften the games. After all poker is an information game, so taking nearly all information out of the game is sort of making it dumber. Meanwhile rake goes through the roof and nobody wins except PartyP.